SIGNATURE STYLE CATCH GRILLED HADDOCK vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
SIGNATURE STYLE CATCH GRILLED HADDOCK: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SIGNATURE STYLE CATCH GRILLED HADDOCK | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 71 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 15.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SIGNATURE STYLE CATCH GRILLED HADDOCK | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SIGNATURE STYLE CATCH GRILLED HADDOCK | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 305 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 27 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 235 MG | 571 MG |