SHURFINE vs ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHURFINE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHURFINE: 5
vs
ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHURFINE | ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 1,161 cal | 367 cal | |
| Protein | 19.4 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 135.5 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fat | 71.0 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 38.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHURFINE | ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHURFINE | ALMOND SOFT BAKED BISCOTTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 258 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 350 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 742 MG | 67 MG |