SHUR SAVING vs TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHUR SAVING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SHUR SAVING: 5
vs
TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHUR SAVING | TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 10.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHUR SAVING | TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHUR SAVING | TRADITIONAL POLISH SEASONED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 979 MG | 821 MG |