SHUR SAVING vs LANCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 7 out of 14 nutrient categories
SHUR SAVING: 3
vs
LANCE: 7
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHUR SAVING | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 440 cal | 484 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 8.4 g | |
| Carbs | 72 g | 71.6 g | |
| Fat | 16 g | 16.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 8.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHUR SAVING | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHUR SAVING | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.9 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 480 MG | 284 MG |