SHUR SAVING vs 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHUR SAVING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHUR SAVING: 5
vs
25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHUR SAVING | 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHUR SAVING | 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHUR SAVING | 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 339 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,446 MG | 1,036 MG |