SESMARK vs ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK CRACKLINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SESMARK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SESMARK: 4
vs
ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK CRACKLINS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SESMARK | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 76.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SESMARK | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SESMARK | ORIGINAL CHICHARRONES PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 1,214 MG |