SESAME TERIYAKI CEDAR PLANK ATLANTIC SALMON vs TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SESAME TERIYAKI CEDAR PLANK ATLANTIC SALMON: 3
vs
TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SESAME TERIYAKI CEDAR PLANK ATLANTIC SALMON | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 74 cal | |
| Protein | 19.7 g | 15.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 13.7 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SESAME TERIYAKI CEDAR PLANK ATLANTIC SALMON | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SESAME TERIYAKI CEDAR PLANK ATLANTIC SALMON | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 17 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 368 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 145 MG | 168 MG |