SELMA'S vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SELMA'S wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SELMA'S: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SELMA'S | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 419 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 58.1 g | 76.2 g | |
| Fat | 18.6 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SELMA'S | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SELMA'S | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 279 MG | 36 MG |