SEATTLE SHORTBREAD vs SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SEATTLE SHORTBREAD: 1
vs
SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEATTLE SHORTBREAD | SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 542 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fat | 29.2 g | 20.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEATTLE SHORTBREAD | SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEATTLE SHORTBREAD | SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 138 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 396 MG | 52 MG |