SEA SALT FLAVORED BAKED RICE THINS vs SESMARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SESMARK wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
SEA SALT FLAVORED BAKED RICE THINS: 0
vs
SESMARK: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEA SALT FLAVORED BAKED RICE THINS | SESMARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 86.7 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEA SALT FLAVORED BAKED RICE THINS | SESMARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEA SALT FLAVORED BAKED RICE THINS | SESMARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 433 MG |