SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL vs SOURDOUGH HOAGIE ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL wins in 8 out of 15 nutrient categories
SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL: 8
vs
SOURDOUGH HOAGIE ROLLS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL | SOURDOUGH HOAGIE ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 160 cal | 256 cal | |
| Protein | 8 g | 8.9 g | |
| Carbs | 46 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 2 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fiber | 18 g | 2.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL | SOURDOUGH HOAGIE ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 100 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL | SOURDOUGH HOAGIE ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 80 MG | 88 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 3.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 60 MG | 96 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 380 MG | 478 MG |