SCHALLER & WEBER vs HARD SALAME
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARD SALAME wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SCHALLER & WEBER: 0
vs
HARD SALAME: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCHALLER & WEBER | HARD SALAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Fat | 39.3 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCHALLER & WEBER | HARD SALAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCHALLER & WEBER | HARD SALAME | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,071 MG | 1,536 MG |