SANDSTONE vs WHOLE PEPPERONCINI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SANDSTONE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SANDSTONE: 5
vs
WHOLE PEPPERONCINI: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SANDSTONE | WHOLE PEPPERONCINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 18 cal | |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 33.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SANDSTONE | WHOLE PEPPERONCINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 16 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SANDSTONE | WHOLE PEPPERONCINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 467 MG | 1,179 MG |