SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH vs WHITE HAMBURGER BUNS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE HAMBURGER BUNS wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH: 5
vs
WHITE HAMBURGER BUNS: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH | WHITE HAMBURGER BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 279 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 9.3 g | |
| Carbs | 48.2 g | 53.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH | WHITE HAMBURGER BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 4.7 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH | WHITE HAMBURGER BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 57 MG | 233 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 464 MG | 442 MG |