SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH vs HOAGIE ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HOAGIE ROLLS wins in 8 out of 14 nutrient categories
SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH: 4
vs
HOAGIE ROLLS: 8
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH | HOAGIE ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 242 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 8.1 g | |
| Carbs | 48.2 g | 46.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH | HOAGIE ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE TAKE & BAKE SOURDOUGH | HOAGIE ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 57 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 100 MG | 76 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 464 MG | 505 MG |