SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH vs ROSEMARY GARLIC FOCACCIA ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROSEMARY GARLIC FOCACCIA ROLLS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH: 4
vs
ROSEMARY GARLIC FOCACCIA ROLLS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH | ROSEMARY GARLIC FOCACCIA ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 271 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 8.2 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 52.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH | ROSEMARY GARLIC FOCACCIA ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH | ROSEMARY GARLIC FOCACCIA ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 62 MG | 74 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 438 MG | 588 MG |