SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH vs FRANKFURTER BUNS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRANKFURTER BUNS wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH: 3
vs
FRANKFURTER BUNS: 7
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH | FRANKFURTER BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 256 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH | FRANKFURTER BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 3.7 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH | FRANKFURTER BUNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 62 MG | 140 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 438 MG | 465 MG |