SABLE & ROSENFELD vs PLOUGHMAN'S PLUM CHUTNEY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SABLE & ROSENFELD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SABLE & ROSENFELD: 5
vs
PLOUGHMAN'S PLUM CHUTNEY: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SABLE & ROSENFELD | PLOUGHMAN'S PLUM CHUTNEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SABLE & ROSENFELD | PLOUGHMAN'S PLUM CHUTNEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 4 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SABLE & ROSENFELD | PLOUGHMAN'S PLUM CHUTNEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,500 MG | 333 MG |