R.W. KNUDSEN FAMILY HIBISCUS COOLER vs BRUCE TEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BRUCE TEA wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
R.W. KNUDSEN FAMILY HIBISCUS COOLER: 3
vs
BRUCE TEA: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | R.W. KNUDSEN FAMILY HIBISCUS COOLER | BRUCE TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 42 cal | 18 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10.4 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | R.W. KNUDSEN FAMILY HIBISCUS COOLER | BRUCE TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 13.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | R.W. KNUDSEN FAMILY HIBISCUS COOLER | BRUCE TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 4 MG | 0 MG |