RUGEN FISCH vs WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RUGEN FISCH: 2
vs
WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RUGEN FISCH | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 380 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 15 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36 g | 7.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RUGEN FISCH | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RUGEN FISCH | WILD ALASKAN PINK SALMON FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 159 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 590 MG | 429 MG |