ROTISSERIE CHICKEN vs SLOW-ROASTED PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROTISSERIE CHICKEN wins in 9 out of 16 nutrient categories
ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 9
vs
SLOW-ROASTED PORK: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 202 cal | 157 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 11.4 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 3 UG | 0 UG | |
| Pantothenic acid | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0.4 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 20 MG | 0 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 175 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 405 MG | 457 MG |