ROCKIN' RANCH PLANT-BASED PROTEIN SNACK vs MARCELLED POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROCKIN' RANCH PLANT-BASED PROTEIN SNACK wins in 9 out of 11 nutrient categories
ROCKIN' RANCH PLANT-BASED PROTEIN SNACK: 9
vs
MARCELLED POTATO CHIPS: 0
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ROCKIN' RANCH PLANT-BASED PROTEIN SNACK | MARCELLED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 459 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 43.2 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 29.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 18.9 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fiber | 18.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ROCKIN' RANCH PLANT-BASED PROTEIN SNACK | MARCELLED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ROCKIN' RANCH PLANT-BASED PROTEIN SNACK | MARCELLED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 108 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 946 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 649 MG | 632 MG |