ROAST BEEF SUB vs CHICKEN CAESAR CONEWHICH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROAST BEEF SUB wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
ROAST BEEF SUB: 7
vs
CHICKEN CAESAR CONEWHICH: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ROAST BEEF SUB | CHICKEN CAESAR CONEWHICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 173 cal | 207 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 16.0 g | |
| Carbs | 19.2 g | 18.3 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 7.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ROAST BEEF SUB | CHICKEN CAESAR CONEWHICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.5 MG | 0.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ROAST BEEF SUB | CHICKEN CAESAR CONEWHICH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 157 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 588 MG | 258 MG |