RICKLAND ORCHARDS vs COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
RICKLAND ORCHARDS: 3
vs
COVERED ALMONDS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICKLAND ORCHARDS | COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 550 cal | 550 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 7.5 g | |
| Carbs | 45 g | 52.5 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 5 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICKLAND ORCHARDS | COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICKLAND ORCHARDS | COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 150 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 112 MG | 50 MG |