RICHIN vs ORIGINAL STONE GROUND MUSTARD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RICHIN wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICHIN: 2
vs
ORIGINAL STONE GROUND MUSTARD: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICHIN | ORIGINAL STONE GROUND MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICHIN | ORIGINAL STONE GROUND MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICHIN | ORIGINAL STONE GROUND MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 3,067 MG | 1,500 MG |