RICH NATURE vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICH NATURE: 2
vs
EMERALD: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICH NATURE | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 450 cal | 565 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 23.5 g | |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 47.1 g | |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 11.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICH NATURE | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICH NATURE | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 235 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 625 MG | 635 MG |