RICH CHOCOLATE vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RICH CHOCOLATE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICH CHOCOLATE: 6
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICH CHOCOLATE | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 60 g | Tie |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICH CHOCOLATE | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICH CHOCOLATE | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 100 MG |