RICH CHOCOLATE vs MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
RICH CHOCOLATE: 1
vs
MARSHMALLOW: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICH CHOCOLATE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 471 cal | 405 cal | |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 2.7 g | |
| Carbs | 70.6 g | 64.9 g | |
| Fat | 17.7 g | 13.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICH CHOCOLATE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICH CHOCOLATE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 108 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 147 MG | 176 MG |