RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS vs ELMER CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ELMER CHOCOLATE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 3
vs
ELMER CHOCOLATE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | ELMER CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 412 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 76.5 g | |
| Fat | 35 g | 14.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | ELMER CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | ELMER CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 59 MG |