RICED GARDEN VEGETABLE PILAF WITH SEA SALT vs MEAT TORTELLINI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEAT TORTELLINI wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RICED GARDEN VEGETABLE PILAF WITH SEA SALT: 4
vs
MEAT TORTELLINI: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICED GARDEN VEGETABLE PILAF WITH SEA SALT | MEAT TORTELLINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 35 cal | 180 cal | |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 7 g | |
| Carbs | 4.4 g | 33 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICED GARDEN VEGETABLE PILAF WITH SEA SALT | MEAT TORTELLINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICED GARDEN VEGETABLE PILAF WITH SEA SALT | MEAT TORTELLINI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 142 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 372 MG | 140 MG |