RICE PILAF vs BEEF FLAVOR LOWER SODIUM RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF FLAVOR LOWER SODIUM RICE wins in 6 out of 14 nutrient categories
RICE PILAF: 5
vs
BEEF FLAVOR LOWER SODIUM RICE: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICE PILAF | BEEF FLAVOR LOWER SODIUM RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 339 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 73.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICE PILAF | BEEF FLAVOR LOWER SODIUM RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICE PILAF | BEEF FLAVOR LOWER SODIUM RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 804 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 839 MG |