RET BAG V/P TUNA STK vs SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RET BAG V/P TUNA STK: 4
vs
SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RET BAG V/P TUNA STK | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 116 cal | |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 20.5 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RET BAG V/P TUNA STK | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RET BAG V/P TUNA STK | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 11 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 294 MG | 429 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 24 MG | 49 MG |