RET BAG IVP TUNA vs 8/10 OZ SNAPPER FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
8/10 OZ SNAPPER FILLET wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RET BAG IVP TUNA: 3
vs
8/10 OZ SNAPPER FILLET: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RET BAG IVP TUNA | 8/10 OZ SNAPPER FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 97 cal | |
| Protein | 23.4 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RET BAG IVP TUNA | 8/10 OZ SNAPPER FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RET BAG IVP TUNA | 8/10 OZ SNAPPER FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 32 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 355 MG | 416 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 39 MG | 62 MG |