RESTAURANT STYLE BACON vs ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
RESTAURANT STYLE BACON: 1
vs
ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RESTAURANT STYLE BACON | ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 500 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 42.9 g | 35.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 35.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RESTAURANT STYLE BACON | ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RESTAURANT STYLE BACON | ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,500 MG | 2,071 MG |