REDUCED FAT MILK vs EVAPORATED SKIM MILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EVAPORATED SKIM MILK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT MILK: 2
vs
EVAPORATED SKIM MILK: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT MILK | EVAPORATED SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 81 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 12.3 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT MILK | EVAPORATED SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT MILK | EVAPORATED SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 127 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 57 MG | 117 MG |