REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK vs NATURAL GROUND BISON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL GROUND BISON wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK: 2
vs
NATURAL GROUND BISON: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | NATURAL GROUND BISON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 241 cal | 168 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | NATURAL GROUND BISON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | NATURAL GROUND BISON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 179 MG | 53 MG |