REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK vs ITALIAN STYLE HERB PORK TENDERLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN STYLE HERB PORK TENDERLOIN wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK: 2
vs
ITALIAN STYLE HERB PORK TENDERLOIN: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | ITALIAN STYLE HERB PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 241 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | ITALIAN STYLE HERB PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT GROUND PORK | ITALIAN STYLE HERB PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 179 MG | 250 MG |