REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS vs CHICKEN HOT DOGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS: 6
vs
CHICKEN HOT DOGS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 11.6 g | |
| Carbs | 6.1 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 16.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REDUCED FAT GLATT KOSHER BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 918 MG | 1,140 MG |