RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN vs CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN: 0
vs
CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN | CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 35.7 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN | CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED WINE SWEET ITALIAN | CLASSIC ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 482 MG | 1,133 MG |