RED VINTAGE COOKING WINE vs COMFORT CREEK FOODS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED VINTAGE COOKING WINE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED VINTAGE COOKING WINE: 4
vs
COMFORT CREEK FOODS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED VINTAGE COOKING WINE | COMFORT CREEK FOODS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED VINTAGE COOKING WINE | COMFORT CREEK FOODS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED VINTAGE COOKING WINE | COMFORT CREEK FOODS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 589 MG |