RED VELVET FUDGE vs WILLIAMS & BENNETT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED VELVET FUDGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED VELVET FUDGE: 5
vs
WILLIAMS & BENNETT: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED VELVET FUDGE | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 462 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.1 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 71.8 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 18.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED VELVET FUDGE | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED VELVET FUDGE | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 103 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 154 MG |