RED STAR TIN WITH OLD-FASHIONED SOFT MINT vs THE LONG LASTING CHEW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THE LONG LASTING CHEW wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED STAR TIN WITH OLD-FASHIONED SOFT MINT: 0
vs
THE LONG LASTING CHEW: 2
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED STAR TIN WITH OLD-FASHIONED SOFT MINT | THE LONG LASTING CHEW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 100 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED STAR TIN WITH OLD-FASHIONED SOFT MINT | THE LONG LASTING CHEW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 179 MG |