RED PINK vs MIDWOOD BRANDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED PINK wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED PINK: 6
vs
MIDWOOD BRANDS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED PINK | MIDWOOD BRANDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 512 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 65.1 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 30.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED PINK | MIDWOOD BRANDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED PINK | MIDWOOD BRANDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 105 MG | 0 MG |