RED HOT LINKS vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED HOT LINKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RED HOT LINKS: 5
vs
HATFIELD: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED HOT LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 286 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 23.2 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED HOT LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED HOT LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 168 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 293 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 393 MG | 750 MG |