RED HOT CHICHARRONES FLAVORED PORK SKINS vs COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
RED HOT CHICHARRONES FLAVORED PORK SKINS: 1
vs
COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RED HOT CHICHARRONES FLAVORED PORK SKINS | COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 50 g | 50 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RED HOT CHICHARRONES FLAVORED PORK SKINS | COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RED HOT CHICHARRONES FLAVORED PORK SKINS | COLOSSAL STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,000 MG | 2,571 MG |