REAL SLICED BAKED POTATO CHIPS vs NEAL BROTHERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
REAL SLICED BAKED POTATO CHIPS wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
REAL SLICED BAKED POTATO CHIPS: 8
vs
NEAL BROTHERS: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | REAL SLICED BAKED POTATO CHIPS | NEAL BROTHERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 435 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 73.9 g | 60.7 g | |
| Fat | 10.9 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 8.7 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | REAL SLICED BAKED POTATO CHIPS | NEAL BROTHERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 26.1 MG | 21.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | REAL SLICED BAKED POTATO CHIPS | NEAL BROTHERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 1,565 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 478 MG | 321 MG |