RASPBERRY FLAVOR ICED TEA vs KUM & GO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KUM & GO wins in 2 out of 7 nutrient categories
RASPBERRY FLAVOR ICED TEA: 1
vs
KUM & GO: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RASPBERRY FLAVOR ICED TEA | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 1,167 cal | 39 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 283.3 g | 9.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RASPBERRY FLAVOR ICED TEA | KUM & GO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 83 MG | 8 MG |