RANCH ORGANIC DRESSING vs SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH ORGANIC DRESSING wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH ORGANIC DRESSING: 7
vs
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH ORGANIC DRESSING | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH ORGANIC DRESSING | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH ORGANIC DRESSING | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 643 MG |