RANCH DRESSING vs SWEET FRENCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
SWEET FRENCH DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | SWEET FRENCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 367 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 36.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | SWEET FRENCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | SWEET FRENCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,067 MG | 200 MG |