RANCH DRESSING vs HOME STYLE RICH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 5
vs
HOME STYLE RICH DRESSING: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | HOME STYLE RICH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 46.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | HOME STYLE RICH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | HOME STYLE RICH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 53 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 733 MG |